Have a Rumor or Story to Submit? Send us an E-MAIL!

25th April 2008

A Necessary Evolution for the iPod Touch

The iPod Touch has continued to captivate me. I’ve been increasingly interested in purchasing one for quite some time. The ability for the iPod Touch/iPhone/OS X software to become more complex and developed, alongside 3rd party app development, is making it an enticing buy. But what’s holding me back?

For starters, there’s a hefty price tag–$299 for an 8GB model. I have a relatively large music collection, but an even larger (size) of TV Shows and Movies that I’ve downloaded from Apple’s iTunes store. By all means I don’t have to have my entire iTunes library with me at all times, but sometimes I want to rock out to some punk and sometimes I want to listen to some indie rock. I go through different music moods and I want to easily switch between my whole library.

What occurs to me is that every sign is pointing me towards the iPod classic. It’s got the size, ability to play TV Shows and Movies, and is even slighty smaller than the iPod touch. Unfortunately, I don’t want to part ways with the iPod touch’s features and larger viewing screen.

I want the touch interface and web capabilities of the iPod touch with the storage capacity of the iPod classic. Oh and one more thing, I’d like to see the device’s size shrink down to that of an iPod nano.

iPod touch interface, iPod classic storage size, and iPod nano form factor. Bring me that Apple, and I’ll hardly think twice about dropping $299.

Nano Touch

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

posted in Apple (AAPL), iPod, iPod Nano, iPod Touch, iPod Classic, iTunes, Mac | 0 Comments

7th September 2007

Microsoft is Bleeding; The Zune is a Loser

Oh so often in Microsoft’s (MSFT) not so intellectual business moves, they go ahead and enter a market and business that isn’t natural for a software company. Microsoft’s Live Search is a perfect example of a company’s desperate attempt to enter a new market. Spending tremendous amounts of capital for a third-rate search experience. In another attempt at grabbing extra revenue from other markets, Microsoft’s failure of a music player, the Zune, is losing traction, fast.

 

Meanwhile, Apple (AAPL) has been making record profits, as their products continue to skyrocket towards greater sales and margins. The introduction of the iPod in 2001 is without a doubt when Apple began its tremendous turnaround. Now, with 5 products that all have a variety of “iPod” functionality and market share that encompasses about 75 to 80 percent of music player sales, it’s clear that Apple is creating THE music player.

product-black-classic.jpg

Despite these terrible statistics for an entering company, Microsoft decided to go forth with their own music player. With a choice of three colors, Brown, Black, and White, the Zune player certainly hasn’t failed because of choices (not that the color variable was even in question). Originally, the Zune introduced at a competitive price of $249 to Apple’s iPod, which was priced at $299. Both were 30 GB large and both were capable of playing video, but any real similarities or postives for the Zune end there.

zune_trouble.jpg

The Apple iPod product line-up has continuously been evolving. Various additions to the original iPod product have also been introduced. What has Microsoft been doing in the mean time? Price-cutting, price-cutting, and a little bit more price-cutting. Oh, I almost forgot, they added a whole two new colors! The player has quickly dropped 20 percent of its original price tag. Originally selling for $249, the player now sells for $199 (little known to much of the current media, as the price drop was made on September 5th, or the day of Apple’s special event), and can even be found on interestingly sketchy sites for about $149.

woot_zune.gif

The Zune was doomed from the start. The music player isn’t cross-compatible with Macintosh computer platforms, and only works with Microsoft’s own attempt at a music store/player. That means that any music you’ve downloaded from the iTunes store can’t get transferred to the Zune.

744px-pirate_flag_of_rack_rackhamsvg.pngScariest of all, are the deep cuts into the price point, without any real noticeable upgrades and improvements. The Zune was to compete directly with the regular iPod, which is now known as the iPod Classic. The funny thing is that the Zune is now $199, and still 30 GB. Meanwhile, the iPod Classic has a base price point of $249, and comes with an 80 GB hard drive. Sorry Microsoft, but your price cuts aren’t upgrades, find some other product/business to steal market share from.

Disclosure: Long Apple Inc. (AAPL)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

posted in Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), iPod, iPod Classic | 5 Comments

5th September 2007

The Entire iPod Family Reinvents Itself

With the holiday season just around the corner, and an impressive new line of updated and new iPods, Apple (AAPL) is set-up to make a killing.

Here’s a brief rundown:

iPod Shuffle

  • Reinvented Colors
  • Product (RED) Color

cp_top_3x_shuffle_070905.jpg

iPod Nano

  • New Stockier Version
  • Cut to $149 and $199
  • Plays Video
  • Slideshows with Music
  • New User Interface

cp_top_3x_nano_070905.jpg

iPod Classic

  • New Name for Original iPod
  • 80 GB and a larger 160 GB Hard Drive
  • Rounded, All-Metal Casing
  • Now from $249
  • New User Interface
  • Black and White

product-black-classic.jpgproduct-white-classic.jpg

iPod Touch

  • 8 GB and 16 GB
  • 3.5″ Touch-Screen Interface (much like the iPhone)
  • Wi-Fi Enabled
  • Download Music from iTunes Store Wirelessly
  • Safari Web Browser
  • YouTube Online Videos
  • 8MM thin
  • Starting from $299

cp_top_3x_touch_070905.jpg

iPhone

  • Wi-Fi iTunes Downloads
  • No longer offering a 4 GB version
  • Price Reduction of the 8 GB to $399!

prod-iphone.jpg

Disclosure: Long Apple Inc. (AAPL)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

posted in Apple (AAPL), iPod, iPod Shuffle, iPod Nano, iPod Touch, iPhone, iPod Classic | 0 Comments


Translate to: