Have a Rumor or Story to Submit? Send us an E-MAIL!

September 7th

Microsoft is Bleeding; The Zune is a Loser

posted in Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), iPod, iPod Classic |

Oh so often in Microsoft’s (MSFT) not so intellectual business moves, they go ahead and enter a market and business that isn’t natural for a software company. Microsoft’s Live Search is a perfect example of a company’s desperate attempt to enter a new market. Spending tremendous amounts of capital for a third-rate search experience. In another attempt at grabbing extra revenue from other markets, Microsoft’s failure of a music player, the Zune, is losing traction, fast.

 

Meanwhile, Apple (AAPL) has been making record profits, as their products continue to skyrocket towards greater sales and margins. The introduction of the iPod in 2001 is without a doubt when Apple began its tremendous turnaround. Now, with 5 products that all have a variety of “iPod” functionality and market share that encompasses about 75 to 80 percent of music player sales, it’s clear that Apple is creating THE music player.

product-black-classic.jpg

Despite these terrible statistics for an entering company, Microsoft decided to go forth with their own music player. With a choice of three colors, Brown, Black, and White, the Zune player certainly hasn’t failed because of choices (not that the color variable was even in question). Originally, the Zune introduced at a competitive price of $249 to Apple’s iPod, which was priced at $299. Both were 30 GB large and both were capable of playing video, but any real similarities or postives for the Zune end there.

zune_trouble.jpg

The Apple iPod product line-up has continuously been evolving. Various additions to the original iPod product have also been introduced. What has Microsoft been doing in the mean time? Price-cutting, price-cutting, and a little bit more price-cutting. Oh, I almost forgot, they added a whole two new colors! The player has quickly dropped 20 percent of its original price tag. Originally selling for $249, the player now sells for $199 (little known to much of the current media, as the price drop was made on September 5th, or the day of Apple’s special event), and can even be found on interestingly sketchy sites for about $149.

woot_zune.gif

The Zune was doomed from the start. The music player isn’t cross-compatible with Macintosh computer platforms, and only works with Microsoft’s own attempt at a music store/player. That means that any music you’ve downloaded from the iTunes store can’t get transferred to the Zune.

744px-pirate_flag_of_rack_rackhamsvg.pngScariest of all, are the deep cuts into the price point, without any real noticeable upgrades and improvements. The Zune was to compete directly with the regular iPod, which is now known as the iPod Classic. The funny thing is that the Zune is now $199, and still 30 GB. Meanwhile, the iPod Classic has a base price point of $249, and comes with an 80 GB hard drive. Sorry Microsoft, but your price cuts aren’t upgrades, find some other product/business to steal market share from.

Disclosure: Long Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Place a Text Link Here!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

If you enjoyed this post, make sure to Subscribe to the RSS Feed!

Related Posts:


There are currently 5 responses to “Microsoft is Bleeding; The Zune is a Loser”

  1. 1 On September 7th, 2007, Mikey said:

    Apple certainly leads the race however the race is still on as Nokia launches Ovi website, we written an article about Ovi.

  2. 2 On September 7th, 2007, Eric Y said:

    Sony couldn’t do it . . . actually they got there too late. First to market defines the space. Apple defined it and everyone else is just a copy.

  3. 3 On September 9th, 2007, Aaron said:

    Microsoft has failed quite miserably in this space. I agree that the fact that the Zune will not transfer songs from ITunes is a major mistake. They need a lot bigger price cut than that to effect the market much at all.

  4. 4 On September 10th, 2007, skh.pcola said:

    How is Woot! a “sketchy website?” I’ve never had a bad experience with them, and neither has anybody else that I know who has bought from Woot!

  5. 5 On September 10th, 2007, The Matador said:

    There was no intention of offending Woot or its users. It simply was in reference to how one wouldn’t find the $149 price at Amazon.com (a larger, more well-known online shopping experience).

Leave a Reply

Translate to: